Location Analysis Report for
257 TUSCANY DRIVE NW
TUSCANY, CALGARY, AB
Profile
Intent
Household
In-Depth Report| 19 min read | Generated on December 17, 2025 at 19:14:09
TL;DR
A quick summary of 257 TUSCANY DRIVE NW based on property values, safety, accessibility, and demographics.
The Verdict
Overall assessment based on your profile and priorities.
This $606,000 Tuscany property offers a solid foundation for young professionals, with strong 13% year-over-year appreciation and a respectable 64/100 walk score that puts 183 amenities within walking distance. The community's 43% university-educated population creates excellent networking opportunities, though you'll need to drive for most entertainment options.
High-earning professionals ($58,000+) who want urban convenience without suburban commutes.
Young professionals still building wealth, or those prioritizing investment returns over lifestyle.
Quick Scores
At-a-glance ratings for each category based on your profile.
Strengths & Concerns
Key highlights and potential issues based on your priorities.
Top Strengths
1. Good walkability
With 64/100 walkability and 183 amenities within walking distance, you can handle daily errands on foot, perfect for your busy professional schedule. This saves both time and transportation costs while keeping you active.
2. Pet services accessible
Crime dropped significantly by 22% year-over-year, creating a safer environment for you and your partner to enjoy evening walks with your pets around the neighborhood.
3. Professional community
43% of residents are university-educated, placing you in a community of like-minded professionals ideal for career networking and building meaningful relationships with your neighbors.
Top Concerns
1. Very limited housing variety
With only 1 pet service within walking distance compared to 14 accessible by car, you'll likely need to drive for veterinary visits, grooming, and pet supplies for your furry family members.
2. Below-average walkable essentials
Despite decent walkability, entertainment options are extremely limited with 0 venues within walking distance, meaning you and your partner will need to drive to most date night destinations and social activities.
Key Numbers
Important metrics compared to city averages.
Should you buy here?
A personalized assessment based on your profile and priorities.
What this means for you
Strong 13% appreciation suggests solid investment potential for building equity
Summary
This section summarizes key property value information for this address and the surrounding neighborhood. Review these insights to gain a comprehensive understanding of the local property value landscape.
Highlights
- Assessed Value:$606,000 (+13% YoY, +213% since 2005)
- Year Built:1999
- Lot Size:3,326 ft²
- Estimated Down Payment:$121,200 (20% of assessed value, typically 2-3 years savings)
- Estimated Income Needed:$168,333 combined annual (dual-income household)
- Estimated Monthly Cost:$3,900 total (mortgage $3,200 + taxes/insurance $700)
- Renovation Budget:$30,000-50,000 (5-7 years for updates)
Overview
As a young professional with your partner and pets, this Tuscany property offers suburban living with assessed value 15.6% below the community average. The $606,000 assessed value positions this as a mid-tier entry in a mature neighborhood, requiring $121,200 down and $168,333 combined annual income if purchasing at assessed value.
Your 13% year-over-year growth trails Tuscany's 14.2% average and Calgary's 18.8% citywide rate. However, the property's 40% three-year and 52% five-year appreciation demonstrates consistent value building since the market recovery.
Built in 1999, this detached home on a 3,326 sqft lot provides established neighborhood character with R-CG zoning flexibility for future income potential.
Property Profile
- Assessed $182/sqft - 15.6% below Tuscany's suburban premium
- Property 4 years older than Tuscany median (2003 construction)
- Lot size 81% smaller than Tuscany's 17,533 sqft average
- Consistent permit activity: 38-45 annually, signaling active market
Property Value
This section analyzes the property value of this address and the surrounding neighborhood. Review these insights to gain a comprehensive understanding of the local property value landscape.
2025 Assessed Value
Comparative Analysis
This property's $606,000 assessed value sits 15.6% below Tuscany's $694,940 community average and 6.2% above Calgary's $623,618 citywide mean. At $182 per square foot, you're positioned in the mid-tier range for this established suburban community. Your 13% year-over-year growth trails Tuscany's 14.2% and Calgary's 18.8% averages. The three-year appreciation of 40% from $431,500 (2022) to $606,000 (2025) exceeds Tuscany's 32.6% but lags Calgary's 33.2% rate.
| Metric | Property | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Assessment | $606,000 | $694,940 | $623,618 |
| Assessed Value per Square Foot | $182 | $215 | $171 |
| 3-Year Growth Rate | +40% | +32.6% | +33.2% |
| 5-Year Growth Rate | +52% | +54.3% | +55.3% |
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Key Insights
- Below-average assessed value offers entry point in premium community
- Growth rates lag community but show consistent recovery trajectory
Property Features
Key characteristics that influence this property's market position, livability, and long-term value potential.
Type
Detached
Built in
1999
Lot Size
3,326 ft²
Land Use
R-CG
R-CG is a residential designation that is primarily for rowhouses but also allows for single detached, side-by-side and duplex homes that may include a secondary suite.
Zoning Analysis
R-CG zoning permits single-detached, semi-detached, and duplex uses with potential secondary suite development. This flexibility enables future income generation through basement suite rentals or side-by-side conversion. For young professionals, this zoning provides mortgage offset opportunities through rental income while maintaining single-family character. Future redevelopment options support long-term equity building.
Lot Analysis
This detached home on a 3,326 sqft lot represents standard suburban density for Tuscany's established blocks. The compact lot size sits 81% below the community's 17,533 sqft average, typical for late-1990s construction. Built in 1999, the property is 4 years older than Tuscany's 2003 median and 1 year older than Calgary's 2000 citywide median. With no recent renovations, anticipate modernization needs within 5-7 years for kitchens, baths, and mechanical systems.
Renovation History
This section summarizes the renovation history of the property.
Total Investment
$101,543
| Year | Category | Description | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Residential Improvement Project | Garage | $10,692 |
| 2000 | Single Construction Permit | SFD, FIREPLACE, PORCH | $90,851 |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Comparative Analysis
No renovation permits filed in the last five years. The property has appreciated $208,500 from the 2020 market trough of $398,500 to the current $606,000 assessed value, representing 52% organic growth without capital investment. Typical homes in Tuscany invest in updates at similar rates to citywide averages. Plan $30,000-50,000 over the next 5-7 years for kitchen, bathroom, and system modernizations to maintain competitive positioning.
| Metric | Property | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Investment | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Value Growth | $208,500 | $215,000 | $190,000 |
| Return on Investment | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Renovation Prevalence | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Key Insights
- No recent renovations - budget for updates within 5-7 years
- $208,500 value growth since 2020 trough reflects market recovery
Neighborhood Growth Trends
This section analyzes development patterns and property value trends in the neighborhood. Review these metrics to understand how the area is evolving and how it compares to city-wide growth patterns.
Future Developments
45 building permits +88% from this year2 future permits per 1,000 residents in the community.
Development Pattern Analysis
Tuscany maintains steady development activity with 38-45 permits annually from 2020-2024, projected to continue at 45 permits in future years. This consistent renovation and infill pace signals an active, stable market with ongoing homeowner investment. The mature neighborhood's $694,940 average assessed value and 14.2% year-over-year growth demonstrate sustained demand for this northwest quadrant location. For young professionals prioritizing established amenities over new construction, Tuscany offers proven value retention with moderate appreciation potential aligned with citywide suburban trends.
What this means for you
Crime reduction of 22% indicates improving neighborhood security trends
Summary
This section summarizes key safety information for this address and the surrounding neighborhood. Review these insights to gain a comprehensive understanding of the local safety landscape.
Highlights
- Crime Trend:22% decrease from previous year
- Traffic Incidents:46 incidents (+76% YoY)
- Emergency Services:8 within 10-minute drive
- Crime Rate:5 per 1,000 residents
- Street Lighting:61 lights, 3.1 per 1,000 residents
- Emergency Response:6.4-min EMS, 7-min fire
- Security Budget:$1,500-$3,000 security system
Community Profile
- Tuscany recorded 94 total crime incidents in 2024, representing a crime rate of 5 per 1,000 residents in this northwest community
- With 61 street lights serving the area, Tuscany provides 3.1 lights per 1,000 residents for evening visibility
- Emergency response infrastructure includes 8 facilities with 6.4-minute average EMS response time and 7-minute fire response time
Risk Assessment
As a couple with pets exploring Tuscany, you'll find a moderate safety profile with crime declining 22% year-over-year from 120 to 94 incidents. The property crime focus—particularly theft from vehicles (26 incidents) and vehicle theft (17 incidents)—suggests investing in home security and secure parking for your two-car household. Violent crime remains minimal at 28 incidents, supporting safe evening activities for dining and entertainment. Emergency response times under 7 minutes provide solid coverage for your household needs.
Crime Statistics
Detailed analysis of local crime statistics, showing crime rates by category and trends over time.
Crime Category
94 incidents
-22% from previous year
Comparative Analysis
Tuscany experienced 94 crime incidents in 2024 at a rate of 5 per 1,000 residents, down 22% from 120 incidents in 2023. Property crimes dominate: theft from vehicle (26 incidents, down 36% year-over-year) and vehicle theft (17 incidents, down 7%) are primary concerns for your two-car household. Residential break-ins held steady at 10 incidents, requiring home security investment to protect your property when both you and your partner are at work. Violent crime remains low at 28 total incidents (20 non-domestic violence, 8 assaults down 53%), supporting safe evening activities. As young professionals, the declining property crime trend and minimal violent crime create favorable conditions for your active lifestyle, though vehicle security measures remain essential.
Street Lighting Coverage
Assessment of nighttime visibility infrastructure, a key factor in both perceived and actual community safety.
Coverage
High-density coverage
With 61 street lights per 1,000 residents, this community has a high-density coverage coverage.
Comparative Analysis
Tuscany's 61 street lights provide 3.1 lights per 1,000 residents across this northwest community. Without comparative city data, this represents moderate coverage for evening visibility during your after-work activities and pet walking. The lighting infrastructure supports basic safety for couple activities like evening dining out and late commutes home. However, assess specific lighting density along your commute routes and near the property of interest, particularly for evening dog walks with your pet. Consider supplementing with motion-activated exterior lighting at your property to enhance security during dark hours when both of you are away at work.
Traffic Safety Profile
Analysis of vehicle, pedestrian, and cyclist incidents, revealing traffic safety conditions in the immediate area.
Incident Category
46 incidents
+76% from previous year
Comparative Analysis
Tuscany recorded 46 traffic incidents in 2024 at a rate of 2.31 per 1,000 residents, up 76% year-over-year. Vehicle incidents comprise 45 of these (2.26 per 1,000), while pedestrian incidents remain minimal at 1. This increase warrants attention for your dual-commute household, though the overall rate remains moderate. Focus on defensive driving during your daily commutes and assess traffic patterns near the property during peak hours.
Incident Location Analysis
Without specific incident location data, prioritize homes on residential streets away from high-traffic arterial corridors. When evaluating properties, observe traffic patterns during morning and evening commute times that align with your work schedules. Consider proximity to major roadways when selecting a property, balancing convenience for your commutes against traffic safety for daily driving and pet walking activities.
Environmental Risk Assessment
Evaluation of potential natural hazards including flood, fire, and geological risks based on historical data and infrastructure mitigation.
Flood Risk
No flood risk
This area has minimal flood risk based on historical data and terrain analysis.
Emergency Service Access
Proximity and response time analysis for critical services including medical facilities, fire stations, and police services.
Healthcare Facilities
Fire Stations
Police Stations
| Name | Category | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Northwest Community Health Centre | Healthcare Facility | 8 minutes (8 km) |
| EMS Station 21 | Healthcare Facility | 8 minutes (8 km) |
| Tuscany Community Centre | Healthcare Facility | 2 minutes (1 km) |
| Butterfield Acres Children's Farm | Healthcare Facility | 7 minutes (6 km) |
| Scenic Acres Community Centre | Healthcare Facility | 7 minutes (4 km) |
Showing 1 to 5 of 8 entries
Comparative Analysis
Tuscany benefits from 8 emergency service facilities including 5 healthcare facilities, 3 fire stations, and no police stations. Your property enjoys 6.4-minute average EMS response time and 7-minute fire response time—both under the critical 8-minute threshold for life-threatening emergencies. The closest facility is Tuscany Community Centre at 1 km (2-minute travel time), with Fire Station 42 equally accessible. This strong emergency infrastructure provides peace of mind for your household, particularly for pet emergencies or home incidents. The response times compare favorably for a suburban northwest location, supporting your safety needs as working professionals who value quick emergency access.
What this means for you
Good walkability for errands but limited for entertainment and pet services
Summary
This section summarizes key accessibility information for this address and the surrounding neighborhood. Review these insights to gain a comprehensive understanding of the local accessibility landscape.
Highlights
- Grocery Stores:2 within 15-minute walk
- Restaurants & Cafes:4 within 15-minute walk
- Schools:3 within 15-minute walk
- Car Dependency:High - limited walkable services
- Annual Vehicle Cost:$12,100-$16,500 for 2 vehicles
- Transit Viability:62/100 score (limited routes)
Overview
This property demonstrates limited accessibility positioning within Tuscany, a suburban community in Calgary. The location offers strong recreational access and decent transit connectivity while facing significant challenges with walkable daily services and biking infrastructure. Comparative analysis reveals substantial gaps in accessibility metrics compared to community and city averages, particularly for car-dependent services.
Accessibility Metrics
- Walking accessibility provides 183 services (+27.3% vs city) but concentrated in recreation rather than daily essentials
- Biking accessibility delivers 660 services (-32.1% vs city) with limited infrastructure for active transportation
- Driving accessibility offers 2,379 services (-56.9% vs city), reflecting suburban positioning outside major commercial corridors
- Public transit accessibility provides 183 services (+24% vs city) with reasonable bus connectivity but limited LRT access
Essential Daily Needs
Analysis of access to essential daily needs including groceries, healthcare, and other basic services.
| Category | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health & Personal Care | 6 locations | 10 locations | 56 locations | 6 locations |
| Food & Groceries | 2 locations | 5 locations | 47 locations | 2 locations |
| Banking & Financial | 3 locations | 5 locations | 24 locations | 3 locations |
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries
Service Type
| Service Type | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|
Showing 1 to 0 of 0 entries
Comparative Analysis
This property's access to essential daily needs falls significantly below city standards while matching community levels. Walking accessibility provides minimal convenience for daily errands with only 11 services compared to the city average of 13.36. Driving offers limited options with 127 services versus the city average of 462.84, representing a 72.6% deficit that reflects Tuscany's suburban positioning.
Travel Mode
| Category | Property | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health & Personal Care | 6 | 6 | 7.5 |
| Food & Groceries | 2 | 2 | 3.2 |
| Banking & Financial | 3 | 3 | 2.7 |
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries
Key Insights
- Walking provides minimal convenience with only 11 essential services accessible, matching the community average but 17.7% below city standards
- Biking access remains limited with 20 services (-76.6% vs city avg of 85.67), reflecting inadequate cycling infrastructure for daily errands
- Driving offers 127 services, significantly below both community (349) and city (462.84) averages, requiring longer commutes for routine shopping and services
- Public transit mirrors walking access with 11 services, matching community levels but falling 19.5% below city average connectivity
- Overall daily convenience falls 72.6% below city averages, presenting significant challenges for car-free living as a young professional
Shopping & Retail
Analysis of access to shopping amenities, retail stores, and commercial services.
| Category | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retail Shops | 0 locations | 1 locations | 36 locations | 0 locations |
| Pet Care & Services | 1 locations | 3 locations | 14 locations | 1 locations |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Service Type
| Service Type | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|
Showing 1 to 0 of 0 entries
Comparative Analysis
Shopping accessibility substantially underperforms city standards while matching limited community options. The property offers minimal walkable retail with only 1 service accessible on foot. Driving expands options to 50 services but remains 73.1% below the city average of 186.11, reflecting Tuscany's distance from major shopping districts.
Travel Mode
| Category | Property | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retail Shops | 0 | 0 | 2.4 |
| Pet Care & Services | 1 | 1 | 1.2 |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Key Insights
- Walking provides extremely limited shopping options with only 1 veterinary service accessible, 71.8% below city average of 3.55 total services
- Biking access remains minimal with 4 services (-86.2% vs city avg of 29), offering inadequate options for retail shopping trips
- Driving offers 50 shopping services, falling 62.1% below community average (132) and 73.1% below city average (186.11)
- Public transit mirrors walking limitations with only 1 service accessible, 73.9% below city average connectivity to retail areas
- Overall shopping accessibility falls 73.1% below city standards, requiring vehicle dependency for most retail and pet care needs
Lifestyle & Entertainment
Analysis of access to lifestyle amenities, entertainment venues, and cultural services.
| Category | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dining & Cafes | 4 locations | 10 locations | 153 locations | 4 locations |
| Entertainment Venues | 0 locations | 0 locations | 3 locations | 0 locations |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Service Type
| Service Type | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|
Showing 1 to 0 of 0 entries
Comparative Analysis
Lifestyle and entertainment accessibility significantly underperforms city standards, presenting challenges for your active urban lifestyle. The property offers minimal walkable dining with only 4 establishments accessible on foot compared to the city average of 19.31. Driving expands options to 156 services but remains 75.8% below the city average of 643.79, limiting spontaneous after-work socializing options.
Travel Mode
| Category | Property | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dining & Cafes | 4 | 4 | 18 |
| Entertainment Venues | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Key Insights
- Walking provides limited dining options with only 4 cafes and restaurants accessible, 79.3% below city average of 19.31 services
- Biking access offers 10 dining venues (-91.8% vs city avg of 122.27) with no entertainment venues accessible by bike
- Driving expands to 156 lifestyle services but falls 64.8% below community average (438) and 75.8% below city average (643.79)
- Public transit mirrors walking limitations with 4 services accessible, falling 80% below city average connectivity to entertainment districts
- Overall lifestyle accessibility falls 75.8% below city standards, significantly limiting spontaneous socializing and entertainment options critical for young professionals
Recreation & Outdoors
Analysis of access to recreational facilities, parks, trails, and outdoor activities.
| Category | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recreation & Sports | 55 locations | 196 locations | 577 locations | 50 locations |
| Walking & Cycling Trails | 50 locations | 230 locations | 591 locations | 50 locations |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Service Type
| Service Type | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|
Showing 1 to 0 of 0 entries
Comparative Analysis
Recreation and outdoor accessibility significantly exceeds city standards, providing a key advantage for this property. The location offers exceptional walking access with 105 recreational services compared to the city average of 34.54, representing a 204% advantage. This includes abundant parks, playgrounds, and fitness facilities, though trail infrastructure remains limited with only 0.05km of pathways.
Travel Mode
| Category | Property | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recreation & Sports | 55 | 29 | 20 |
| Walking & Cycling Trails | 50 | 20 | 14.5 |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Key Insights
- Walking provides exceptional recreation access with 105 services (+204% vs city avg of 34.54), including abundant parks, playgrounds, and fitness stations
- Biking offers strong recreational connectivity with 426 services (+81% vs city avg of 235.4), supporting active transportation for fitness activities
- Driving delivers 1,168 recreational services, matching community levels (1,449) and slightly below city average (1,361.85) by 14.2%
- Public transit supports recreation access with 100 services (+189% vs city avg), enabling car-free access to local parks and fitness facilities
- Overall recreation accessibility exceeds city averages by 204%, though trail infrastructure remains limited at 0.05km requiring driving for longer outdoor activities
Mobility & Transportation
Analysis of access to transportation options, transit services, and mobility infrastructure.
| Category | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Transportation | 45 locations | 145 locations | 556 locations | 50 locations |
| Vehicle Services | 12 locations | 35 locations | 241 locations | 12 locations |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Service Type
| Service Type | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|
Showing 1 to 0 of 0 entries
Comparative Analysis
Transportation and mobility accessibility falls below city standards while matching community levels. The property offers moderate public transit connectivity with 62 services accessible compared to the city average of 68.16. Bus stops are well-distributed with 45 walking-accessible stops, though LRT access requires biking or driving, limiting rapid transit options for your daily commute.
Travel Mode
| Category | Property | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Transportation | 45 | 40 | 50 |
| Vehicle Services | 12 | 11 | 15.8 |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Key Insights
- Walking provides access to 57 mobility services (-13.4% vs city avg of 65.81), with 45 bus stops accessible but limited vehicle services
- Biking offers 180 mobility services (-60.2% vs city avg of 451.87), reflecting inadequate cycling infrastructure for transit connections
- Driving delivers 797 services, falling 64.3% below community average (2,235) and 69.2% below city average (2,591.44)
- Public transit provides 62 services (-9% vs city avg of 68.16), with reasonable bus connectivity but limited rapid transit access to employment centers
- Overall mobility accessibility falls 69.2% below city standards, requiring vehicle ownership for commuting despite moderate local bus service
Community & Learning
Analysis of access to schools, education facilities, community services, and public amenities.
| Category | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schools & Education | 3 locations | 9 locations | 44 locations | 3 locations |
| Community Services | 2 locations | 11 locations | 37 locations | 2 locations |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Service Type
| Service Type | Walking | Biking | Driving | Public Transit |
|---|
Showing 1 to 0 of 0 entries
Comparative Analysis
Community services accessibility falls moderately below city standards while matching community levels. The property offers basic walking access with 5 services compared to the city average of 7.19. Driving expands options to 81 services but remains 69.8% below the city average of 268.15, reflecting limited access to government offices and specialized community resources.
Travel Mode
| Category | Property | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schools & Education | 3 | 4 | 4.1 |
| Community Services | 2 | 2 | 3.1 |
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries
Key Insights
- Walking provides limited access to 5 community services (-30.5% vs city avg of 7.19), including basic post office and community center access
- Biking offers 20 services (-57.7% vs city avg of 47.3), with minimal cycling infrastructure connecting to libraries and government offices
- Driving delivers 81 services, falling 64.3% below community average (227) and 69.8% below city average (268.15)
- Public transit supports 5 services (-31.7% vs city avg of 7.33), matching walking access with limited connectivity to specialized services
- Overall community services accessibility falls 69.8% below city standards, requiring vehicle dependency for accessing government offices and community resources
What this means for you
Highly educated community with 43% university graduates offers professional networking
Summary
This section summarizes key demographic information for this address and the surrounding neighborhood. Review these insights to gain a comprehensive understanding of the local demographic landscape.
Highlights
- Marriage Rate:46.1% married, 2.7 avg household size
- Home Ownership:76.9% ownership rate
- Median Income:$50,000
- Age Disparity:4 years younger
- Family Households:81.0%
- Child Population:21.2%
- Income Over $100K:63.4%
- Monthly Ownership Cost:$1,840
- University Degrees:42.7%
- Cultural Diversity:80/100
- Commute Under 30min:71.4%
Overview
As a young professional with your partner, Tuscany offers an established suburban community with strong family orientation and high homeownership rates. The neighborhood skews younger than Calgary overall, with a median age of 34.8 years compared to the city's 38.8. While the area emphasizes car-dependent living with 88.6% driving to work, it provides solid educational attainment and above-average incomes. The community's cultural diversity index of 80 reflects moderate multiculturalism, though English remains dominant at 80.4% as the primary language.
Demographic Profile
- Median Age: 34.8 years (4 years younger than Calgary)
- Family Composition: 81.0% families (Higher than city average)
- Child Population: 21.2% under 15 (Similar to Calgary's 18.0%)
- Ownership Rate: 76.9% (Above city's 67.9%)
Demographics
Analysis of population composition, age distribution, and household characteristics that define the community profile and lifestyle patterns.
Population
562
Population Density
3985.8 per km²
Common Age Group
15 to 64 years
Average Age
34.4
Common Marital Status
Married
Common Family Size
2 persons
Average number of children
1.7 per family
Comparative Analysis
Tuscany's 562 residents create an intimate neighborhood atmosphere. The younger median age of 34.8 positions this as an area where you and your partner fit the demographic profile well. The smaller household size of 2.7 aligns with the broader community pattern of 3.0, though both exceed the city average of 2.7. The working-age population dominates at 72.6%, ideal for career-focused professionals.
| Metric | Census Block | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 562 | 19,310 | 1,306,466 |
| Median Age | 34.8 | 35.8 | 38.8 |
| Household Size | 2.7 | 3 | 2.7 |
| Children (0-14 years old) | +21.2% | +22.8% | +18% |
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Key Insights
- Younger demographic profile supports active lifestyle preferences
- High working-age population indicates employment-focused community
- Household composition favors families over young professionals
Housing
Analysis of housing types, ownership patterns, construction periods, and market positioning that define the residential landscape.
Total housing units
209
Average housing value
$420,000
Average cost of ownership
$1,720per month
Average cost of rent
$1,650per month
Common housing type
Single-detached
Ownership rate
76.9%
Common construction year
1991 to 2000
Common number of bedrooms
3 bedrooms
Common household type
One-family
Average household size
2.7
Comparative Analysis
The 76.9% ownership rate signals strong community stability, though below the surrounding area's 88.5%. Average home values of $420,000 offer relative affordability compared to the community's $538,284 and city's $492,666. Monthly ownership costs of $1,840 provide budget predictability. The housing stock emphasizes larger units, with 66.7% being 3-bedroom homes and 23.1% offering 4+ bedrooms, limiting options for couples without children.
| Metric | Census Block | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Rate | +76.9% | +88.5% | +67.9% |
| Average Home Value | $420,000 | $538,284 | $492,666 |
| Monthly Costs | $1,840 | $1,896 | $1,734 |
| Housing Diversity Index (0-100) | 0 | 28 | 66 |
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Key Insights
- Below-average home values create entry opportunity for first-time buyers
- Limited housing diversity restricts options for non-traditional households
- High ownership rate indicates stable, established community
Economics
Analysis of income levels, employment patterns, education attainment, and economic indicators that define the community's economic landscape.
Median income
$50,000
Income equality
High
Common income group
$100,000-$150,000
Common occupation
Sales and service
Unemployment rate
9.3%
Common education level
Bachelor's degree
Comparative Analysis
The median income of $50,000 appears lower than expected given the affluent income distribution, where 63.4% of households earn over $100,000. This suggests significant income disparity. The 42.7% university education rate exceeds Calgary's 33.7%, supporting professional career growth. The 9.3% unemployment rate warrants attention. Employment concentrates in education and government services (18.9%) and sales/service (22.6%), with solid representation in applied sciences (11.3%).
| Metric | Census Block | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Income | $50,000 | $58,290 | $46,539 |
| Employment Rate | +90.7% | +65% | +60.6% |
| University Education | +42.7% | +42% | +33.7% |
| Professional Employment | +39.6% | +51.4% | +40.1% |
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Key Insights
- Strong educational attainment supports career advancement opportunities
- Income distribution shows concentration in upper brackets
- Professional occupations dominate local employment landscape
Culture
Analysis of immigration patterns, ethnic diversity, cultural composition, and community integration that define the cultural landscape.
Immigration status
28.3% immigrants
Immigrants generation status
51.1% Third generation or more
Citizenship status
95.7%
Common ethnicity
Irish
Common mother tongue
Total - Mother tongue for the total population excluding institutional residents - 100% data
Common religion
Secularism
Comparative Analysis
With 28.3% immigrants, Tuscany shows moderate diversity below Calgary's 33.3%. The cultural diversity index of 80 trails both the community (94) and city (95), suggesting less multicultural vibrancy. English dominates at 80.4%, with small representations of Tagalog, Spanish, and Cantonese. The even split between Christianity (48.9%) and secularism (48.9%) reflects modern Canadian values. Generation status shows 51.1% are third-generation or more, indicating established roots.
| Metric | Census Block | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immigrant Population | +28.3% | +23.5% | +33.3% |
| Cultural Diversity Index (0-100) | 80 | 94 | 95 |
| Language Diversity Index (0-100) | 53 | 42 | 55 |
| Religious Diversity Index (0-100) | 50 | 56 | 63 |
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Key Insights
- Moderate cultural diversity with English-language dominance
- Balanced religious landscape reflects secular trends
- Lower diversity indices compared to broader Calgary
Commute to Work
Analysis of transportation modes, commute durations, and accessibility to employment centers that define mobility patterns.
Common commute mode
Car, truck or van
Common commute time
15 to 29 minutes
Comparative Analysis
Tuscany's transportation landscape heavily favors cars, with 88.6% driving to work compared to Calgary's 83.2%. Public transit usage remains minimal at 5.7%, significantly below the city's 8.3%. For young professionals seeking walkable, transit-oriented neighborhoods, this presents challenges. However, 71.4% enjoy commutes under 30 minutes, with the majority (60%) falling in the 15-29 minute range. Active transportation is virtually absent, limiting car-free lifestyle options.
| Travel Mode | Census Block | Community Average | City Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Car Dependency | +88.6% | +86.9% | +83.2% |
| Active Transportation | +5.7% | +2.5% | +4.2% |
| Public Transit Use | +5.7% | +6.9% | +8.3% |
| Short Commute (30 min or less) | +71.4% | +60.3% | +68.5% |
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Key Insights
- High car dependency requires vehicle ownership for daily activities
- Limited transit access reduces urban connectivity
- Majority enjoy reasonable commute times under 30 minutes
Data sourced from: City of Calgary, Calgary Police Service, Statistics Canada, and OpenStreetMap.